Legal Opinion

State v. Youngblood

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 8, 2009No. 96,850PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnson, J.:

Galen Youngblood appeals his conviction and sentence for possession of hallucinogenic drugs, as a second offense. He claims that the prior misdemeanor conviction used to elevate the severity level of his current crime from a misdemeanor to a felony was unconstitutionally obtained without counsel or a valid waiver of counsel. Accordingly, Youngblood contends that the district court erred in convicting him of a felony in the current case. Finding the prior conviction to be constitutionally infirm, we reverse and remand.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. NealSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. CUELLARBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2012
  3. State v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
  4. State v. TimsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  5. State v. LongCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API