State v. Youngblood
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnson, J.:
Galen Youngblood appeals his conviction and sentence for possession of hallucinogenic drugs, as a second offense. He claims that the prior misdemeanor conviction used to elevate the severity level of his current crime from a misdemeanor to a felony was unconstitutionally obtained without counsel or a valid waiver of counsel. Accordingly, Youngblood contends that the district court erred in convicting him of a felony in the current case. Finding the prior conviction to be constitutionally infirm, we reverse and remand.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. NealSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- CUELLARBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2012
- State v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
- State v. TimsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- State v. LongCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.