Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Martin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 24, 1974No. SC 223PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDOX, Justice.

The question presented here is whether James E. Martin, one of the named insured, was covered by the “uninsured motorist” provisions of State Farm’s policy. Martin’s daughter, Selithia, was seriously injured when struck by an uninsured motorist. State Farm denied coverage, claiming that James Martin had rejected uninsured motorist coverage, when application for the policy was made. The dispute over coverage ended in this declaratory judgment proceeding, in which Martin, as plaintiff, claimed that he was covered under the policy and that he had at no time rejected the uninsured…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. v. ReavesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  2. Key v. Robert M. Duke Ins. AgencySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  3. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. Ex Parte GaunttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  5. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co. v. BlytheCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API