State v. Jorgenson
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELDMAN, Justice.
¶ 1 Alex Hughes (Defendant) was charged with first-degree murder. His insanity defense was supported by a great deal of evidence, including the opinions of all six experts who examined him. Evidently, the state’s experts agreed, as the state presented no expert to contest Defendant’s insanity defense. Notwithstanding this, the jury rejected the defense and convicted Defendant of first-degree murder. Defendant appealed.
¶ 2 In that appeal we determined that despite the state’s weak case on the question of insanity, Defendant was convicted because the prosecutor at trial…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Pool v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. RoganHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Ex Parte LewisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- State v. MoodyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. MinnittArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. KorovkinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- State of Arizona v. Austin Garrett HansenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.