State of Arizona v. Austin Garrett Hansen
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ECKERSTROM, Chief Judge:
¶ 1 The state challenges the trial court’s order granting a mistrial after the jury returned contradictory verdict forms in which it found appellee Austin Hansen guilty of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon but not guilty of its lesser included offense of *64simple assault.1 We conclude the state lacks a right to appeal the mistrial order. We nonetheless exercise our special action jurisdiction to resolve a legal question of statewide importance regarding the effect of an ambiguous verdict. See A.R.S. § 12-120.21(A)(4).
Factual and Procedural Background
¶ 2…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. AdamsonArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. DavoltArizona Supreme Court · 2004
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. RailColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. SantillanesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2022
- Barnes v. BerniniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- State of Arizona v. Anthony Eugene SearightCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2026
- State of Arizona v. Daniel Louis SantillanesArizona Supreme Court · 2024
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.