Legal Opinion
Angelex Ltd. v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 24, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2015-0056PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Angelex Ltd. (“Angelex”), the owner of the foreign-flagged MW AN-TONIS G. PAPPADAKIS (the “Pappadak-is”), filed his action against Defendant the United States of America (the “Government”) under 33 U.S.C. § 1904(h) seeking compensation for losses and damages that Angelex incurred as a result of what it alleges was an unreasonable detention and delay of the Pappadakis by the Government from April to September 2013 during the Government’s investigation and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Intelect Corporation v. Cellco Partnership GpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Long v. District of Columbia Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Nederland Shipping Corp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- Angelex Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Bombardier, Inc. v. United States Department of LaborDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.