Legal Opinion

Hill v. Page & Hill Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 14, 1936No. 30,629PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 268 N.W. 705, 927. In April, 1903, some members of the Page family and of the Hill family formed a Minnesota corporation under the name of Page Hill Company, to deal in timber products and in real and personal property. In 1928 the plaintiff, who then owned 22 per cent of the corporate stock and who was secretary of the corporation, resigned his office in order to associate himself with the W. B. Foshay Company. He continued to be a director of the Page Hill Company until January, 1931. From 1928 for a considerable period plaintiff engaged in negotiations with the Pages to sell…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Geddes v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Metcalf v. American School Furniture Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York · 1903
  3. Hill v. Page & Hill Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Porter v. C. O. Porter MacHinery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Dworsky v. the Buzza Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. Peterson v. New England Furniture & Carpet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  4. Aiple v. Twin City Barge & Towing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  5. Aiple v. Twin City Barge & Towing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API