Legal Opinion

Hill v. Page & Hill Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 14, 1936No. 30,629PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion

Plaintiff in his petition for rehearing insists that the lower court should be reversed on the authority of Paterson v. Shattuck Arizona Copper Co. 186 Minn. 611, 244 N.W. 281. To us it appeared that the question actually decided in that case was so obviously different from that here presented that we did not discuss the case. Here the plaintiff was treated like other stockholders. There the plaintiffs were minority stockholders in the Shattuck company (a prosperous going concern confronted by no exigency), who, the trial court found, had not been fairly treated in the merger with the Denn…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Paterson v. Shattuck Arizona Copper Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hill v. Page & Hill Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API