Peterson v. New England Furniture & Carpet Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Justice.
Plaintiffs appeal from an adverse judgment. The action was tried to the court and findings made and filed. Plaintiffs’ motion for amended findings was denied.
These assignments of error are not sufficient under our rules to raise the question of the findings of fact not being supported by the evidence, vis., “1. The Court erred in making its Findings of Fact numbered IV to XV, inclusive (ff. 373 to 401, incl.).” This does not challenge any one of the ten findings as not supported by the evidence. 1 Dunnell, Minn. Dig. (2 ed. & Supps.) §§ 357 and 358.
However, we think the decision…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re the Receivership of International Radiator Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1914
- William Weisman Realty Co. v. CohenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Graeser v. Phoenix Finance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Axford v. Western Syndicate Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Booth v. Union Fibre Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Barnard v. County of KandiyohiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Dratz v. Occidental Hotel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1949