Legal Opinion

Bustin v. Craven

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1953No. 5628PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUJAN, Justice.

C. T. Bustin and A. O. Smith, doing busi-. ness as Bustin & Smith, in Austin, Texas, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, filed this action in the district court of Bernalillo County against Norman Craven and Paul Hunt, doing business as C & H Motor Company in Albuquerque, New Mexico, hereinafter referred to as defendants, as an action in replevin, wherein plaintiffs sought to recover possession of a 1950 Pontiac automobile and damages for its wrongful detention. The cause was tried to the court without a jury and a judgment rendered in favor of plaintiffs. Defendants appeal.

P…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McKinney v. CroanTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Erwin v. Southwest Investment Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Parma v. First Nat. Bank of CameronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Riggs, Alias Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Damis v. BarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. MontanoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Knotts v. Safeco Insurance Company of AmericaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Wray v. PenningtonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Clovis Finance Company v. SidesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Commercial Credit Corp. v. SmithNevada Supreme Court · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API