Legal Opinion
Damis v. Barcia
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 3, 1943PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Sehenck, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., dissents, upon the authority of Phelps v. McQuade (220 N. Y. 232, 235). The plaintiffs were deceived as to the identity of the person with whom they dealt and to whom title to the automobiles passed. No checks were given as the documents were each postdated. (Lesser v. People, 73 N. Y. 78, 80.)
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Phelps v. . McQuadeNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Lesser v. . PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
3Cited by5 opinions
- Krisel v. DuranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Atlas Auto Rental Corp. v. WeisbergCivil Court of the City of New York · 1967
- Bornhurst v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Stanton Motor Corp. v. RosettiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- Bustin v. CravenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953