Legal Opinion

Riggs, Alias Jones v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 21, 1934No. 16448PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is theft; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

Appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction for theft, his position being that if any offense is shown it is that of theft by bailee. The indictment charged ordinary theft. If the proof is sufficient to bring the offense within the terms of article 1413, P. C., the indictment for ordinary theft will support the conviction. Hawkins v. State, 126 S. W., 268. We quote the provisions of article 1413, supra, as follows: “The taking must be wrongful, so that if the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Hawkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McCain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
  2. Montgomery Fly Cameron v. W. B. Hauck, Sheriff of Bexar County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  3. Bustin v. CravenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  4. T. C. Newcomb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Wade v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API