Legal Opinion
Warren v. Lane County
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 19, 1984No. LUBA 81-102, CA A25365, SC 29672PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarson, J.
The Lane County Board of Commissioners amended the county’s Coastal Subarea Plan and enacted zone changes for rural property owned by respondents Renaghan. The plan amendment and zone changes were adopted to allow commercial resort development of Renaghans’ 186-acre tract. Petitioners Cole and others 1 sought Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) review of the county’s decision, but LUBA dismissed their appeal on the ground that petitioners lacked standing to appeal. The Court of Appeals affirmed LUBA’s order of dismissal, Warren v. Lane County, 62 Or App 682, 662 P2d 755 (1983), and affirmed it…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Benton County v. Friends of Benton CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Jefferson Landfill Committee v. Marion CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Card v. FlegelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Carmel Estates, Inc. v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Warren v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Jefferson Landfill Committee v. Marion CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Garges v. PremoOregon Supreme Court · 2018
- Flowers v. Klamath CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- ELLIS BY AND THROUGH ELLIS v. BlaichDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.