Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 16, 2007No. 43, 2006PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERGER, Justice:

In this appeal, we consider whether a statement given to the police by a mildly mentally retarded juvenile was admissible at his delinquency trial. After viewing a portion of the videotaped statement and hearing testimony from the police officer and others, the Family Court concluded that the juvenile knowingly and voluntarily waived his Miranda rights. On review, we adhere to the totality of the circumstances test, but we consider the juvenile’s mental limitations and the fact that his mother was not with him during the interview as significant factors. Having viewed the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Marine v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  4. Haug v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rambo v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  2. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  3. George v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  4. State v. CooperSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2025
  5. State v. PerrySuperior Court of Delaware · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API