Legal Opinion

Claim of Zaro v. Zaro Tourist & Steamship Ticket Agency, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1927Published

1Per curiam

The carrier having been given an opportunity on the argument to procure if possible representation by the employer on this- appeal and having been unable to do so the appeal must be dismissed. (See Matter of Hammele v. McMahon, 220 App. Div. 60.) Cochrane, P. J., Van Kirk, Hinman, McCann and Whitmyer, JJ., concur. Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs against the insurance carrier to the State Industrial Board.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Claim of Hammele v. McMahonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927