Legal Opinion
United States Industrial Chemical Co. v. Theroz Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 10, 1928No. 2607PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Circuit Judge.
The Theroz Company, as assignee of letters patent Nos. 1,262,267 and 1,262,268, issued to Jacob Sehaub, and 1,313,878, issued to Henry M. Brigham, brought this suit against the Unit ed States Industrial Chemical Company, Ine., and the Sterno Corporation, for infringement of these patents. The defendants pleaded anticipation and lack of invention, and denied -infringement. The District Court held the two Sehaub patents valid and infringed, and referred the case to a master for an accounting. The Brigham patent was held void, on the ground that it was anticipated by the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Winans v. DenmeadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United States v. United Shoe Machinery Co. of New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Harry A. Pursche v. Atlas Scraper and Engineering Co., a Corporation, Atlas Scraper and Engineering Co., a Corporation v. Harry A. PurscheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Black & Decker Mfg. Co. v. Baltimore Truck Tire Service Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
- Gulf Smokeless Coal Co. v. Sutton, Steele & Steele.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
- Florence-Mayo Nuway Co. v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- Donner v. Sheer Pharmacal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.