In Re Bucknam
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Per curiam
The Professional Conduct Board concluded that respondent-attorney Deborah Bucknam violated several provisions of the Code of Professional Responsibility in dealing with a client and his wife over a six-month period in 1989. The Board recommended that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for a period of thirty days and that she be placed on probation for a period of one year under the following conditions: that she successfully complete the multi-state professional responsibility exam, that she forego the collection of any expenses from complainants, and that she not be found to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Marsh, Day & Calhoun v. SolomonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- In Re WrightSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973
- Welts' CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Academy of California Optometrists, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- In Re RosenfeldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re FarrarSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- In Re BlaisSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- In Re WarrenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- In re Glenn Robinson, Esq. (Office of Disciplinary Counsel)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2019
- In re HongistoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.