Legal Opinion
People v. Dugas
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 13, 1966No. Crim. 4901PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShoemaker, P. J.
Defendants Sidney Dugas and John Baker were jointly charged by indictment with robbery and burglary. After a trial by jury, defendant Dugas was convicted of both offenses charged, and defendant Baker was convicted of burglary. Defendant Dugas alone has appealed from the judgment of conviction, and from the order denying his motion for new trial. The latter order is nonappealable.
At approximately 3 a.m. on July 22, 1964, San Francisco Police Officers Forni and Clark received an all-points broadcast that two Negro males had committed a burglary at 1925 Pierce Street and were fleeing from the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Jones v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. WynnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- People v. DevlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Prudhomme v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- George Albert Curry v. Lawrence E. Wilson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- People v. TrujilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Leonard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.