Coltrain Ex Rel. Coltrain v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.
The Atlantic Coast Line Eailroad Company, defendant, states the questions involved as follows: “(1) Is the plaintiff as a matter of law guilty of contributory negligence barring recovery? (2) Is there error in the charge?” We think both questions must be answered against the defendants.
At the close of plaintiff’s evidence and at the conclusion of all the evidence, the defendants made motions in the court below for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. The court below overruled these motions and in this we can see no error.
It is the settled rule of practice and the accepted position in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pokora v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Johnson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Miller v. Union Pacific R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Lincoln v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Cooper v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Atkins v. . Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Atkins v. White Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Parrish v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Cox v. GallamoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Caldwell v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.