Legal Opinion
Teamsters Local 639 Employers Health Trust v. Hileman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 23, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2013-0833PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge
In 2011, a now-defunct Maryland corporation failed to contribute to two employee benefit plans as required by certain collective bargaining agreements and trust dec larations. The trustees of both plans have sued Gary and Robert Hileman, two residents of Maryland who served as directors of the corporation, for overdue contributions and related assessments. Messrs. Hileman move to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. While personal jurisdiction appears to be lacking only over Gary Hileman, the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Service Employees International Union National Industry Pension Fund v. Liberty House Nursing Home of Jersey City, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Liebman v. Deutsche Bank National Trust CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Bricklayers & Trowel Trades International Pension Fund v. Valley Concrete, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017