United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Geswein
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO, District Judge:
The Court issues this Opinion and Order in furtherance of its March 28, 2013 Order (ECF DKT # 104), denying Defendants’ Motions (ECF DKT # 79, # 80, & # 81) to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint, and upon consideration of Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders, 564 U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 2296, 180 L.Ed.2d 166 (2011) and Gabelli v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 568 U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 1216, 185 L.Ed.2d 297 (2013). After conducting a thorough analysis, and based upon the following reasoning, the Court denies Defendants’…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. ZandfordSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hurt v. Commerce Energy, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2015
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. CollyardDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. JonesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2015
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. CroweDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016
- Alberto L. Castillo Miranda v. Warden of the Golden State Annex ICE Detention Facility, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.