Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Jones
District Court, D. Utah
Decided December 18, 2015No. Case No. 1:13-CV-00163-BSJPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DISGORGEMENT
Bruce S. Jenkins, United States Senior District Judge
Following a bench trial, the court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order finding (i) under a valid 102(e) Bar Order, R. Gordon Jones (“Jones”) was not allowed to practice before the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”), and (ii) Jones did practice before *1182the SEC during the prohibited time period and thereby violated such Bar Order.1
The remaining issue before the court is the authority, method, and amount of an appropriate remedy.
Having considered the parties’ briefs,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. First Jersey Securities, Inc. And Robert E. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Manor Nursing Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. HackmanDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. AhmedDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2016