Bresnahan v. Tripp Giant Leveller Co.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts.
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, District Judge.
The litigation involving the validity and scope of the Cutcheon patent has been protracted over a period of eight years. Questions in respect to its validity and scope, in different aspects, have been several times before the circuit court', and twice before the circuit court of appeals for the First circuit, wherein its patentability and its utility have been repeatedly sustained and explained. It is now strenuously urged by counsel for the Cutcheon interests that from the beginning the relations of the present appellants to the litigation involving the Cutcheon…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Stark v. StarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Bresnahan v. Tripp Giant Leveller Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1896
- Columb v. Webster Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1898
- Herrick v. Tripp Giant Leveller Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carson v. American Smelting & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- Hatch Storage Battery Co. v. Electric Storage Battery Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1900
- Bresnahan v. Tripp Giant Leveller Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1900
- Liimatainen v. St. Louis River Dam & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- American Sulphite Pulp Co. v. Burgess Sulphite Fibre Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.