People v. Di Ryana
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. Wm. P. Lawlor, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
The defendants were convicted of forgery. They moved for a new trial and in arrest of judgment, which motions were denied. From the judgment and from the order denying their motion for a new trial defendants prosecute this appeal.
The indictment alleges that the defendants committed the crime of forgery, “by falsely and fraudulently forging and counterfeiting the handwriting of Pasquale Solimena to a certain instrument in writing for the payment of money,” which instrument was an ordinary form of proof of loss used by insurance companies. The document is as follows:
“To the Hamburg-Bremen Fire…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CostelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Rembert v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- People v. Van AlstineMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- People v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Tell v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re McVickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. KaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- In Re MacKay Ex Rel. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Pueblo v. Rivera TorresSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1948
- In Re McVickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.