Leffler v. Watson

Action in replevin to recover four barrels of whisky shipped by appellees to Simonds & Co., and by them sold to appellant, from' whom they were replevied by appellees.

*177The insufficiency of the evidence is earnestly presented by counsel, but their argument, while strong and forcible, is applicable rather to the trial court than to the appellate tribunal. Here the rule is thoroughly established that we. must view the evidence in the light most favorable to appellees, and if, when so regarded, there be some evidence fairly sustaining every material fact essential to their recovery we cannot…