Legal Opinion

Warner v. Warner

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 12, 1903No. 4,318PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From Adams Circuit Court; D. I). Heller, Judge. Action, by Sarah E. Warner against James Warner. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, P. J.

This cause was commenced in the Allen Circuit Court, wherein a demurrer to the complaint for want of sufficient facts was overruled. In her complaint the appellee Sarah E. Warner alleged that she was the widow of Samuel Warner, deceased, who died September 1, 1900, in Allen county; that while he was dangerously ill, August 30, 1900, the appellant James Warner who was his father, through the agency of his two other sons, Berlin and William Warner, “wrongfully and tortiously induced the said Samuel Warner, without her knowledge or consent, to execute to said James Warner, his father, a paper he…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. McCorkleIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Kuhns v. GatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Bertelson v. BowerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Lester v. EastIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  5. McTaggart v. RoseIndiana Supreme Court · 1860

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. O. A. Olin Co. v. LambachIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Mata v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. KnoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Aldridge v. ClasmeyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Bruno v. Phillips & Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API