Legal Opinion
Belmont v. Associates National Bank (Delaware)
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 18, 2000No. 1:99-cv-03445PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TRAGER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Peter Belmont, an attorney licensed to practice in the State of New York, but acting pro se in this matter, brought this suit against Associates National Bank (Delaware) (“Associates”) under the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA” or the “Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq., and Regulation Z thereunder, 12 C.F.R. § 226.13, for failure to properly respond to a notice of billing error and for having threatened to make adverse credit reports while the billing error remained unresolved.
Peter Belmont alleges that on a monthly statement dated May 5, 1998,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kay v. EhrlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Leathers v. MedlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kulak v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Stafford v. Cross Country BankDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2003
- In Re Texaco Inc. Shareholder Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Burnstein v. Saks Fifth Avenue & Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- Kurz v. Chase Manhattan BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Clement v. American Honda Finance Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.