Legal Opinion

State v. Gibson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 13, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

De Graff, J. —

The State concedes that defendant is licensed to practice osteopathy. The defendant does not claim that he is licensed to practice medicine. The statute defines osteopathy as follows:

“The word ‘osteopathy’ as used in this act is the name of that system of the healing art which places the chief emphasis on the structural integrity of the body mechanism as being the most important factor for maintaining the organism in health.” Section 3, Chapter 77, Acts of the Thirty-ninth General Assembly.

Section 15 of said chapter prohibits osteopathic physicians “to prescribe or give internal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Katzman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  2. Davidson v. Kentucky Coal Lands Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Patrick EdouardSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  2. State v. SolomonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  3. State v. CorneliusSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  4. State v. StoddardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  5. State v. McPheetersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API