State v. Stoddard
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtKindig, J.
— The defendant-appellant, Dr. Genevieve G. Stod dard, is an osteopath duly licensed to practice that profession in the state of Iowa. She, in April, 1931, was engaged at Waukon in the practice of osteopathy, and it is charged by the State, in its petition for an injunction, that she there, in addition to the practice of that profession, engaged in the practice of medicine. Such practice of medicine by the appellant, an osteopath, the state declares, was illegal because an osteopath, as such, has no right to practice medicine. It is contended by the state that the appellant practiced medicine…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. FraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- State v. BreseeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- State v. BonhamWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- State v. HowardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- People v. T. Wah HingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. Kindy Optical Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- State v. . BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- State v. McPheetersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933