Legal Opinion

Katzman v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 6, 1910PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Criminal Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court bt

Judge Carroll

Affirming.

The information filed hy the Commonwealth against the appellant, who is a druggist, charged that he unlawfully sold at retail, not on a physician’s prescription, to Will Frazier a certain quantity of poison, to-wit: Opium, without satisfying htimself that such poison was to be used for legitimate purposes, and with the knowledge that it was intended for smoking purposes or for habitual use. It was returned under section 2630 of the Kentucky Statutes, reading in part:

“No person shall sell at retail any poisons except as herein provided, without…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
  2. Kentucky Board of Pharmacy v. CassidyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  3. Commonwealth v. TrentCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Houston & T. C. Ry. Co. v. StevensonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  2. Wingfield v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  3. Commonwealth v. GoldburgCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. Baker v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  5. Hodge v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API