Legal Opinion
Danny Alan Vestal v. Bill Clinton James B. Hunt
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided February 4, 1997No. 96-6089PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Sanctions imposed by published per curiam opinion.
OPINION
2Per curiam
Danny Alan Vestal is before us as plaintiff/appellant for the seventh time "within a year. All of Vestal’s claims in the past have been totally frivolous. This appeal is no exception. Vestal now argues that the President of the United States and the Governor of North Carolina are “breaking the Laws of God” by swearing oaths on the New Testament upon taking office. Complaint at 3. Vestal concludes that, as a result of this action by President Clinton and Governor Hunt, Vestal is “suffering undue punishment and distress because the…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Whitaker v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Shieh v. KakitaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Attwood v. Singletary, Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Bast v. Cohen, Dunn & Sinclair, PCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- JONES v. ABC-TV Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by20 opinions
- Rodriguez v. Suzuki Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1999
- Anderson v. The State of North CarolinaDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2024
- Baxter v. Nissan of ShelbyDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2023
- Bear v. PotterDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1999
- Brown v. Registrar of Deeds For Cleveland CountyDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2024
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.