Legal Opinion
Attwood v. Singletary, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 22, 1996No. 95-6710PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Per curiam
Pro se petitioner Robert Attwood requests leave to proceed in forma pauperis under Rule 39 of this Court. We deny this request pursuant to Rule 39.8. Attwood is allowed until February 12,1996, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38 and to submit his petition in compliance with this Court’s Rule 33. We also direct the Clerk not to accept any further petitions for certiorari from Attwood in noncriminal matters unless he pays the docketing fee required by Rule 38 and submits his petition in compliance with Rule 33.
Attwood has abused this Court’s certiorari process. In November…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Martin v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
3Cited by21 opinions
- Frederick Lynwood Foley v. Ms. C. Fix Sergeant Santiago Ms. SwisherCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- In Re Alfred J. VincentCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Danny Alan Vestal v. Bill Clinton James B. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- In Re TelfairDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- Robert Lee Brock, A/K/A Two Souls Walker v. Ronald AngeloneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.