Legal Opinion
Whitaker v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 17, 1995No. 94-7743PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Per curiam
Pro se petitioner Fred Whitaker has filed a petition for writ of certiorari and requests leave to proceed in forma pauperis under Rule 39 of this Court. Pursuant to Rule 39.8, we deny petitioner’s request to proceed informa pauperis.* Petitioner is allowed until May 8, 1995, to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38 and to submit his petition in compliance with this Court’s Rule 33. For the reasons explained below, we also direct the Clerk of the Court not to *209accept any further petitions for certiorari from petitioner in noncriminal matters unless he pays the docketing fees required by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Martin v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- In Re SassowerSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Day v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Demos v. StorrieSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In re WhitakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Jerry Montgomery v. Cecil Davis, Larriante J. Sumbry v. Cecil DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Frederick Lynwood Foley v. Ms. C. Fix Sergeant Santiago Ms. SwisherCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- In Re Alfred J. VincentCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Danny Alan Vestal v. Bill Clinton James B. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Robert Lee Brock, A/K/A Two Souls Walker v. Ronald AngeloneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.