Legal Opinion
Haning v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided September 30, 2015No. Case No. 2:14-cv-308PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ALGENON L. MARBLEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This dispute under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq., comes before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record. (Docs. 13 and 14). Teri Haning alleges that The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (“Hartford”) wrongfully terminated her long-term disability benefits. Accordingly, Haning filed suit under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B) to recover those benefits. Because Hartford acted arbitrarily and capriciously in terminating her…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Helton v. AT & T Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Williams v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Linda Gail Calvert v. Firstar Finance, Inc., F/k/a Star Bank Corporation, and Liberty Life Assurance Company of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tobin v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2017
- Cassidy v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2021
- Copeland v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, TheDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2024
- Jalali v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
- Lloyd v. The Procter & Gamble Disability Benefit PlanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.