Legal Opinion

Lloyd v. The Procter & Gamble Disability Benefit Plan

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided December 3, 2020No. 1:18-cv-00032Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION - CINCINNATI MARK LLOYD, Case No. 1:18-cv-32 Plaintiff, : Judge Matthew W. McFarland V. THE PROCTER & GAMBLE DISABILITY : BENEFIT PLAN, et al., Defendants. : ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (DOC. 28), GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE RECORD (DOC. 29), ORDERING THE PAYMENT OF PARTIAL DISABILITY PAYMENTS FROM JANUARY 16, 2017 THROUGH JANUARY 28, 2017, AND TERMINATING ACTION This ERISA case is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Robert D. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  2. Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Wanda Glenn v. Metlife (Metropolitan Life Insurance Company) and Long Term Disability Plan for Associates of Sears, Roebuck and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  4. Patricia Elliott v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  5. Richard Kalish v. Liberty Mutual/liberty Life Assurance Company of BostonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API