Legal Opinion
Helton v. AT & T Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided March 6, 2013No. 11-2153PublishedCited by 300 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WYNN wrote the opinion, in which Judge SHEDD and Judge KEENAN concurred.
OPINION
WYNN, Circuit Judge:
After first learning in 2009 that she had been entitled to begin collecting her full pension benefits nearly eight years earlier, plaintiff Francine Helton contacted her pension plan seeking to recoup her lost benefits. The pension plan denied Helton’s claim, and Helton, in turn, brought this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) against defendants AT & T Inc., her former employer, and the AT & T Pension Benefit Plan…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- CIGNA Corp. v. AmaraSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- D.P. Muth J.P. Muth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by300 opinions
- Adib Makdessi v. Lt. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Brian Davison v. Phyllis RandallCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Federal Trade Commission v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Dan Ryan Builders, Inc. v. Crystal Ridge Development, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Nancy Harrison v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
295 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.