Legal Opinion

Golden Gate Hill Development Co. v. County of Alameda

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 25, 2015No. A142500PublishedCited by 12 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMONS, J.

In a November 2009 election in the County of Alameda (County), voters approved Measures I and J (the Measures), levying special parcel taxes by the Albany Unified School District (District). Plaintiff and appellant Golden Gate Hill Development Company, Inc. (appellant), is the owner of a parcel of real property in the City of Albany subject to the tax. In February 2014, appellant filed the present lawsuit against the County and District (respondents) seeking a refund of taxes paid under the Measures. The complaint alleges the tax rates in the Measures are improper because…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. City of Ontario v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Hernandez v. City of PomonaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Friedland v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. State Board of Equalization v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Savea v. YRC Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Cal. Taxpayers Action Network v. Taber ConstructionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Campana v. East Bay Mun. Utility Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2023
  4. Campana v. East Bay Mun. Utility Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2023
  5. Coachella Valley Water Dist. v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API