Legal Opinion
Savea v. YRC Inc.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided April 10, 2019No. A152379PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wiseman, J.*
*176Plaintiff Vaiula Savea (Savea), employee of defendant YRC Inc. (YRC), filed a complaint against YRC alleging YRC failed to provide the correct employer name and address on its wage statements as required by Labor Code section 226, subdivision (a)(8).1 The trial court sustained YRC's demurrer to the complaint without leave to amend, and Savea appeals. He contends the court erred by: (1) determining that the wage statements-which listed YRC's fictitious business name as the employer name and listed an employer address that did not contain a mail stop code or ZIP+4 Code-did not…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Cicairos v. Summit Logistics, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Pinkerton's, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Maldonado v. Epsilon Plastics, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Elliot v. Spherion Pacific Work, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Chhatrala Investments, LLC v. Elajou Investment Group, L.P. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Noori v. Countrywide Payroll & HR Solutions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2019