Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Neal

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1956No. 33442PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

This is an action by the purchasers for the rescission of the sale of a motel, on the ground of fraud, i.e., misrepresentation as to what the motel had earned while operated by the defendants, upon which the plaintiffs were entitled to and did rely.

The trial court found that the defendants had represented to the plaintiffs that the motel had realized as gross revenue for the year prior to November 12,1953, the amount of six thousand dollars, and that that amount included fifty-four hundred dollars realized during the ten months from January 1, 1953, to November 1, 1953; and further found that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bowman v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Garratt v. DaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Central Life Assurance Society v. ImpelmansWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Cunningham v. Studio Theatre, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Beaulaurier v. Washington State Hop Producers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BurriWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Wold v. WoldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  3. Matsko v. DallyWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. McWhorter v. BushCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  5. Alexander Myers & Co. v. HopkeWashington Supreme Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API