Legal Opinion · Dissent

Alexander Myers & Co. v. Hopke

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1977No. 44124Published

1DissentStafford, J.

(dissenting) — The majority has based its opinion upon three types of contact between plaintiff and defendants which are said to result in actionable misrepresentation. My review of the record reveals no basis for that conclusion.

The first type of contact is an assumed actionable misrepresentation by the alleged agent of defendant. The majority opinion is based primarily upon the assumed existence of an "agency" between the real estate broker, Estvold, and the. defendants Hopke. In making that assumption the majority has overlooked the fundamental premise that "agency" is not itself a fact.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. In Re Welfare of SegoWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. Reader's Digest Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Courseview, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Moss v. VadmanWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Estill v. Sisters of CharityWashington Supreme Court · 1970

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API