Legal Opinion
State v. Trotman
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 26, 2002No. AC 21242PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*439 Opinion
FOTI, J.
The defendant, Lori Trotman, appeals from the judgment of the trial court revoking her probation pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-32 and committing her to the custody of the commissioner of correction for a period of four years. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) concluded, on the basis of the evidence, that her urine sample tested positive for the presence of an opiate, (2) found that she violated the terms of the plea agreement1 and (3) revoked her probation. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. GarvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Truelove & MacLean, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Ghant v. CommissionerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Aubin v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. StevensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. LopezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. Van EckConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. RosadoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Arroyo v. University of Connecticut Health CenterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.