Legal Opinion
Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Truelove & MacLean, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 30, 1996No. 15375; 15376PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
This appeal principally concerns the applicability of the remedies provided by various general antidiscrimination statutes in the context of discriminatory employment practices. The claimant, Kristine A. Jennings, filed with the commission on human rights and opportunities (commission) a complaint alleging that her former employer, the defendant, Truelove and Maclean, Inc.,1 had discriminated against her because of her pregnancy. After a public hearing, a commission hearing officer determined that the defendant had engaged in discriminatory employment practices, and awarded the claimant…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Home Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Normand Josef Enterprises, Inc. v. Connecticut National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Bridgeport Hospital v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Seals v. HickeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Rose v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Lostritto v. Community Action Agency of New Haven, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Cotto v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Vollemans v. Town of WallingfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.