Legal Opinion
Krizan v. NEWMAN & COMPANY
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided September 4, 1980No. 36136PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hill, Justice.
We granted certiorari to determine the applicability of Code Ann. § 84-1404 (a) to this suit by an Iowa realtor to recover a real estate broker’s fee. Krizan v. Newman & Co., 153 Ga. App. 337 (265 SE2d 68) (1980).
Code Ann. § 84-1404 (a), supra, which is part of our real estate broker’s licensure law, provides that “No person shall bring or maintain any action in the courts of this State for the collection of compensation for the performance of any of the acts mentioned in this Chapter without alleging and proving that he was a duly licensed real estate broker or salesman at the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Head v. New Mexico Board of Examiners in OptometrySupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chapman Co. v. Service Broadcasting Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Keenan Company v. Pamlico, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Krizan v. Newman & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
3Cited by7 opinions
- UNIFUND GENERAL, INC. v. OrrCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Johnson v. ORIENTAL WEAVERS RUG MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Starr v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Wanamaker v. Esther Wynne Realty Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Chase & Taylor, Inc. v. MilamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.