Legal Opinion

Krizan v. Newman & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 8, 1980No. 58904PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Banke, Judge.

This is an action to recover a broker’s fee from the sale of an Atlanta hotel. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment based upon Code Ann. § 84-1404 (a), which provides: "No person shall bring or maintain any action in the courts of this state for the collection of compensation for the performance of any of the acts mentioned in this chapter without alleging and proving that he was a duly licensed real estate broker or salesman at the time the alleged cause of action arose.” Plaintiff contends that a Georgia real estate license was not required because…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mathews v. GreinerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  2. Berchenko v. Fulton Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Atlanta, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  3. KEENAN COMPANY v. Pamlico, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. Berchenko v. Fulton Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Krizan v. NEWMAN & COMPANYSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Johnson v. ORIENTAL WEAVERS RUG MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. Starr v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  4. Chase & Taylor, Inc. v. MilamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API