Legal Opinion

Carter P. v. Pook & Pook, LLC.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 27, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-5715PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

STENGEL, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Presently pending are multiple Motions by the named Defendants in this Lanham Act and antitrust action to dismiss the Amended Complaint (“AC”) of Plaintiffs Carter P. (“Reese”) and Sarah Reese (collectively the “Reeses”).1 For the reasons that follow, I. grant the pending Motions, save for several common law claims against Defendants Jay Lowe2 and Mike Caffarella.

II. STANDARD OF REVIEW

A motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to, state a claim upon which relief can be granted examines the…

2Cases cited82 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  5. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Vantage Learning (USA), LLC v. Edgenuity, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Government Employees Insurance Co. v. NealeyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Mallory v. S & S PublishersDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Kornea v. J.S.D Mgmt., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Egli v. StrimelDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API