Legal Opinion

Egli v. Strimel

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 2017No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-3693PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Rufe, J.

Before the Court is the motion for summary judgment of Defendants John C. Brooks, George Strimel, and Radnor Studio 21, Inc. (“RS21”). Also before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Christopher Egli’s motion to dismiss and/or for summary judgment, which seeks dismissal of Defendants’ counterclaims. For the reasons that follow, both motions will be granted.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff is a filmmaker, and this dispute concerns the refusal of RS21, a public access television station in Radnor Township, Pennsylvania, to air his 2016 film Americans Risking Everything. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Arthur Thompson v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  2. KOVALEV v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. KOVALEV v. CLAIBORNEDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. MARTINEZ v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. REPOTSKI v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY PROBATION AND PAROLE DEPARTMENTDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API