Legal Opinion

People v. Bales

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1946No. Crim. 497PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

The defendant was charged with forcible rape and, in a second count, as a different oflense but connected in its commission with the first, with the crime of kid naping in that he forcibly took the same woman from the intersection of two streets in the town of Westmorland to a point about one and a half miles away. A jury, found him guilty on the first count and not guilty on the second count. .This appeal followed.

The appellant contends (1) that his conviction under the rape charge is a nullity as being inconsistent with his acquittal on the kidnaping charge, since the same unlawful force is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. People v. ClineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. People v. BodkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. State v. DizonHawaii Supreme Court · 1964
  5. People v. NewlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API