Legal Opinion
Salinas v. Riverside Finance Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 7, 1932No. Docket No. 953PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from an order refusing to vacate a default and a default ' judgment, which motion was made under the provisions of section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
The action was filed September 8, 1931, and personal service of summons was had on appellant. Its default for failure to appear was taken October 17, 1931. Judgment was rendered after evidence was taken on November 16, 1931. A notice of motion to vacate the default and the judgment on the grounds of mistake, inadvertence, surprise and excusable neglect was filed November 28, 1931, and denied December 14, 1931. This…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stern & Goodman Investment Co. v. DanzigerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Guyot v. CassabCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Harrison v. CousinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Patterson v. RutherfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kwon v. KwonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Bartholomew v. CrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Mason v. Coalinga Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Johnson v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Davison v. GentryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.