Legal Opinion
Bartholomew v. Cross
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 16, 1940No. Civ. 2903PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the record on appeal is not properly certified so that there is no record on which the issues may be determined.
Plaintiff commenced this action against Lyle G. and Ella Cross to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by him when he was struck by their automobile. Defendants answered denying negligence and alleging the contributory negligence of plaintiff.
On May 23d, 1940, the State Compensation Insurance Fund filed a notice of lien on any settlement or judgment in favor of plaintiff by reason of its becoming obligated to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jeffords v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Stern & Goodman Investment Co. v. DanzigerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Martin v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Guyot v. CassabCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Salinas v. Riverside Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Asamen v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Luftenburg v. LuftenburgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Svoboda v. LambertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Culver v. CulverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Wynecoop v. CoatsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942