Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Johnson

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 1, 1933No. Docket No. 673PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[1] This is an appeal from an order vacating the levy of an execution and quashing the writ. The record presented is most deficient. There is no judgment-roll, reporter's transcript, nor bill of exceptions. The record consists of copies of the order appealed from and the notice of appeal and various orders, minute orders and affidavits. The clerk certified that they were true and correct copies of the originals on file in his office. There is no certificate of the judge contained in the record. In cases of this kind counsel should have a bill of exceptions settled.

As the record before us is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Guyot v. CassabCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Salinas v. Riverside Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clanton v. ClantonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Bartholomew v. CrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Davison v. GentryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. San Bernardino County Savings Bank v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API