Legal Opinion
Et Ve Balik Kurumu v. B. N. S. International Sales Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 17, 1960PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
In its complaint, the plaintiff alleges that it is a “ State Enterprise of the Republic of Turkey and as such is an integral part of the Government of the Republic of Turkey ’ \ Its duties, among other things, 11 are to develop in the Republic of Turkey the meat and fish industry and to supply the public and army with meat and fish for their consumption ’ ’. The defendant B. N. S. International Sales Corporation and the defendant Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York are domestic corporations. The plaintiff pleads a contract between it and the defendant B. N. S., a copy of which is annexed…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Ex Parte Republic of PeruSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- National City Bank of NY v. Republic of ChinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. Norwegian Barque TheklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Kunglig Jarnvagsstyrelsen v. Dexter & Carpenter, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of CubaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Victory Transport Incorporated, Owner of the S.S. Hudson v. Comisaria General De Abastecimientos Y Transportes, Voyage Charterer of thes.s. HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Ehrlich-Bober & Co. v. University of HoustonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Aerotrade, Inc. v. Republic of HaitiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Abrams v. Société Nationale Des Chemins De Fer FrançaisDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.